History Vs. Hollywood Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

History Vs. Hollywood - Essay Example This paper depicts the comparison of history and Hollywood. An emphasis will be given to selected Hollywood movies, which have played a significant part in illustrating the historical events, as well as the significant contributions of Hollywood. 2.0 Historical Events In the fall of the nineteenth century, historical films became interesting as demand for these productions proliferated. In the inception of the twentieth century, historical films were among the numerous genres that were successfully made (Hall and Neale 2). Historical events gained more interest in the world today. History had once dominated the world of television when viewers demanded more of television series showcasing past events (McConville 8). This will tell how interested people are to better fathom the history of the world despite the significant changes in the environment today. Moreover, Hollywood did not have a good standing as an interpreter of history. American movie creators sometimes associated with th e manipulative schemes such as supplementing inventive scenes in the history; thus, rewriting a new set of events or even called â€Å"rape of US history† (McCrisken and Pepper 1). Historical events shaped the records straight to the next generation through numerous approaches such as contextualizing through books, films, and many other means. History tells people about how the world did a long time ago before everything becomes smooth. History is full of warfares, conflicts, struggle, success and suffering. Hollywood is one of the many facets why history becomes more tangible and memorable to the present generation. 3.0 The Filmmaking Industry In the world now, historical events are not just present in readings, but also visualizations. Moviemakers now are adopting primitive stylistic facets to develop the entertainment value, as well as the return of investments from these productions. A paradigm of this kind of act is the adaptation of a true-to-life story films. However, creators of films exclude some historical characters, shorten the series of events, concentrate on only a few turmoil situations, and crash out a huge amount of minor information. The stories focus on the important characters, and not on the significant concerns, concentrating on the lives of the late heroes and heroines, and warfare has become a favorite formula. Filmmakers concentrate on the poor and humble, romance, social status and the villains, who are sometimes emerged as powerful in terms of earthly possessions (Toplin 10). Movie creators have manipulative proofs on their productions. They commenced to produce inventive events conveyed in the story, and riveted dramas into the scene to capture the interest of the audience. These panoramas have introduced ambiguity into the minds of the viewers, which leads them to scan books from libraries and do research (Toplin 15). 4.0 Hollywood’s Interpretation of Historical Events History itself has many revelations that cannot a fford to buy someone’s beliefs. However, a lot of interpretations of historical events have been made by Hollywood. One of this paradigm is the movie Apocalypto, which is an action epic film regarding the ancient Maya. The director of the movie, Gibson, firmly stands by himself about the movie as though, some of the events did not really happen in the past or somehow, might happen but has no physical evidence. The production was thought to

Ottoman and Japanese Political Systems (c.1820-1920) Essay

Ottoman and Japanese Political Systems (c.1820-1920) - Essay Example to the conquest of Varna and capture of Constantinople that made the Ottoman Empire as the oldest surviving empire of Europe within a century (Rahme 31). The old Ottoman Empire however declined and became as the Turkey that we know today after it allied with Germany in the First World War. Prior to its dissolution attempts were made to improve its state in reconstituting its own political system but the reforms instituted were just too late to save the old Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire decline begun with the series of war beginning with the invasion of Egypt and Syria by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1798 to 1801. The intervention of the French, Russian and British due to the advances and occupation of Muhammad Ali Pasha’s army in Anatolia and Syria also precipitated its decline as it has grown weaker due to the war. The call for independence of the Greeks that eventually led to its independence as a self-governing nation also diminished its territory. European leaders however were concerned how will the Ottoman collapse will pose to the general peace. Such they made an attempt to maintain the Ottoman State so as not to cause instability in their region. They agreed to maintain its integrity by â€Å"reversing the potentially devastating results of war at the negotiating table and, in 1856, admitting the Ottoman state into the â€Å"Concert of Europe† (Quataert 56). Thus the European consensus then was to keep Ottoman state intact despite its weak stature as an attempt to maintain it as a viable state. Internally, an attempt was made by Selim III and Mahmud II instituted drastic reform known as the Tanzimat or reform or reorganization as an effort to reinvigorate and reconstitute their own political systems. One of the main reason of the decline of Ottoman was its harsh and inept rule coupled with a bankrupt coffers and Tanzimat was implemented to address it. Hat-i Shariff launched the firstTanzimat in 1839 where all persons banished or condemned to death